LANGUAGE MEANS OF THE EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL REALIZATION OF ENGLISH ECONOMIC DISCOURSE
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

англомовний економічний дискурс, мовні засоби, економічна компетентність, комунікативна мобільність, міжкультурна комунікація. English-language economic discourse, economic competence, linguistic means, global communication space, cross-cultural professional interaction.

How to Cite

ВОЙТАНІК, І. В., & ТЕРСІНА, І. З. (2025). LANGUAGE MEANS OF THE EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL REALIZATION OF ENGLISH ECONOMIC DISCOURSE. ACADEMIC STUDIES. SERIES “HUMANITIES”, (2), 56-62. Retrieved from http://178.20.159.203/index.php/humanities/article/view/729

Abstract

The article explores English-language economic discourse as a powerful educational resource that fosters the development of economic competence, cognitive mobility, and intercultural communicative competence among modern learners. In the context of globalization and intensified international communication, the English language performs not only an informative but also an educational function by providing access to professional knowledge and discursive practices in the field of economics. The aim of the article is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the linguistic means that realize the educational potential of English economic discourse. The analysis covers lexical-grammatical, stylistic, cognitive, and communicative features of economic texts across professional and mass-media genres. Special attention is paid to the role of specialized terminology, modal constructions, genre diversity, and stylistic devices that contribute to the formation of economic literacy, critical thinking, and the ability to engage in effective intercultural interaction. The study emphasizes that English economic discourse not only conveys professional information but also models a conceptual picture of economic reality, supports the acquisition of norms and values of the business environment, and contributes to the development of both linguistic and cognitive competence. The article analyzes examples from analytical texts that illustrate the functional load of linguistic means in the process of conveying complex economic information. It concludes that the study of linguistic features of English economic discourse is essential for modernizing economic education and preparing specialists capable of acting effectively in a globalized linguistic and professional space. Moreover, the integration of economic discourse elements into the language education process promotes the development of systemic economic thinking, the ability to interpret current economic phenomena, and a deeper understanding of the interdisciplinary link between language and economics.

PDF (Українська)

References

Демченко Н. С., Береговенко Н. С. Англомовні неологізми у сучасному економічному дискурсі. Актуальні питання іноземної філології. Одеса, 2022. Вип. 16. С. 25–32.

Лут К. А. Жанрова типологія англомовного економічного дискурсу. «Нова філологія» Запорізького національного університету: зб. наук. пр. Запоріжжя, 2012. Вип. 49. С. 133–136.

Bielenia-Grajewska M. English economic discourse borrowings. Journal of Economic Linguistics. 2009. 12 (2), 78–88.

BIS. Annual Economic Report. Bank for International Settlements. 2023.

Brown T. Dialogic strategies in business education: A communicative approach to teaching economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2020. 34 (2), 60–72.

Cogo A. English as a Lingua Franca and Global Business Communication: Critical Perspectives. Routledge. 2023, 45–67.

Davies M. Crisis and Regulation: Lessons from the 2008 Meltdown. Global Economic Review. 2021. 19 (3), 120–126.

Ghia E. Languages and Translation in the Global Market. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Languages and Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan. 2012. 215–230.

Goodrich P. Legal discourse and its characteristics. Journal of Legal Studies. 1984. 6 (1), 45–57.

Johnson P. Liquidity and Stability in Post-Pandemic Markets. Economic Stability Studies. 2021. 14 (2), 84–90.

Kachmar O. Yu. Economic discourse as a type of institutional discourse // Наукові записки Національного університету «Острозька академія»: серія «Філологія». Острог : Вид-во НаУОА, 2021. Вип. 11 (79). С. 80–84.

Kravchenko O. Cognitive and communicative aspects of international legal discourse. International Journal of Linguistics. 2007. 3 (4), 89–102.

Lee M. & Han Y. Housing Policies and Market Volatility. Journal of Urban Economics. 2022. 33 (1), 70–78.

Lopez D. FDI and Innovation in Emerging Economies. Emerging Markets Analysis, 2023. 16 (4), 203–210.

Lorenzo-Dus N. & Bou-Franch P. Discourse, Media, and Society: Mapping New Directions in Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. 2022, 120–138.

Mills S. Discourse. Routledge. 2024, 1–15.

Nguyen T. Cross-Cultural Competence in Trade Negotiations. Global Commerce Quarterly, 2022. 8 (2), 85–92.

Savelyuk N. Features of economic discourse: Emotiveness, clarity, and practical usage. Journal of Economic Discourse Studies. 2020. 8 (1), 34–49.

Singh V. Fiscal Strategies in an Uncertain World. Global Fiscal Policy Review. 2023. 17 (1), 27–33.

Smith R., Patel J. & Gomez A. Central Banking in a Post-COVID World. Journal of Economic Policy. 2022. 24 (1), 110–116.

Spires H. A. Critical Perspectives on Global Literacies: Education and Communication in the 21st Century. Teachers College Press. 2021, 89–105.

van Dijk T. A. Discourse as structure and process. Sage Publications. 1997, 47–70.

Williams D. Volatility and Sentiment in Financial Markets. Market Dynamics Journal. 2020. 9 (3), 50–55.

Zhang X. & Grenier C. The intersection of linguistics and economics. Linguistics and Economics Review, 2012. 5 (1), 123–137.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Array