CATEGORIES OF GENDER IN INTERACTION
PDF

Keywords

гендер, мовлення, спілкування, поведінка, взаємодія, стереотип, плітки. gender, speech, communication, behavior, interaction, stereotype, gossip.

How to Cite

SVIDER, I. A., & FRASYNYUK, N. I. (2022). CATEGORIES OF GENDER IN INTERACTION. ACADEMIC STUDIES. SERIES “HUMANITIES”, (1), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.52726/as.humanities/2022.1.28

Abstract

The speech code theory investigates the manner in which groups of human beings communicate due to particular social, cultural, gender or other factors. Thus, every speech code contains the notion of what it means to be a male or female, it gives the patterns of speech behavior depending on the social roles of each individuum. The aim of the paper is to consider and analyze the characteristic features of gender relations in the implementation of intercultural communication and problems that arise in such interaction. The relevance of this issue lies in deepening and intensification of intercultural ties between the states, as well as intensifying the struggle for democracy principles and norms, which includes overcoming social problems and, in particular, problems of gender relations. Gender is an integral part of speech behavior, it determines the stereotypical forms of behavior, confirmed by language means (verbal and non-verbal) that allow a person to present himself or herself in the society. The particular attention is paid to gossip as a social and speech phenomenon and unavoidable activity among women and men as well. Gender differences in gossiping are also still under examination. Such means as hedging, boasting, talkativeness, intonation, interruption typical for gender interaction help us to specify gender roles in the society and characterize some nuances of communication and to dispel stereotypes. Also, the lexical peculiarities of female and male speech are analyzed. From the gender point of view, the following outcomes have been noted. Women are interrupted more than men; they tend to provide feedbacks to the utterance of the other participants more than men; both women and men are talkative; women have the different choices and frequency of the lexical items comparing to men; the speech of women is full of redundancy; women tend to gossip more than men; women hedge their speech acts to avoid being direct and clear.

https://doi.org/10.52726/as.humanities/2022.1.28
PDF

References

Корнєва Л. М. Гендерний аспект комунікації. Філологічні науки. Полтава, 2013. Вип. 13. С. 106–113.

Ликова К. І. Ґендерний аспект лінгвістичних досліджень художнього тексту. Львівський філологічний часопис. Львів : «Гельветика», 2019. № 6. С. 144–147.

Марчишина А. А. Маскулінність у постмодерністському тексті : поняття, ідентичність, образ. Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Германська філологія. Чернівці : Рута, 2021. Вип. 831–832. С. 187–198.

Фоменко О. С. Ґендер і мова. Основи теорії ґендеру / за ред.Скорик М. М. Київ, 2004. С. 453–576.

Хайдар Д. М. Гендерна специфіка комунікації. Закарпатські філологічні студії. Ужгород, 2018. Т. 1, вип. 7. С. 120–125.

Backer C. Like Belgian Chocolate for the Universal Mind. Interpersonal and Media Gossip from an Evolutionary Perspective. 2005. URL: http://www.ethesis.net/gossip/gossip_contence.htm (Last accessed: 25.04.2022).

Coates J. Women, men and language : A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. Harlow : Longman, 2004. 245 p.

Eckhaus E., Ben-Hador B. Gossip and gender differences : a content analysis approach. Journal of Gender Studies, 2019. Vol. 28(1). P. 97–108.

Holmes J. An introduction to sociolinguistics. New York : Routledge, 2013. 512 p.

Holmes J. Paying compliments : a sex-preferential politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics. 1988. № 12. P. 445–465.

James D., Clarke S. Women, Men, and Interruptions : A Critical Review. Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York : Oxford University Press, 1993. P. 231–280.

Lakoff R. Language and Woman’s place. New-York : Harper&Row, 1975. 309 p.

Romaine S. Communicating Gender. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999. 424 p.

Rysman A. How the gossip became a woman. Journal of Communication. № 27. 1977. P. 176–180.

Tannen D. You just don’t understand : Women and men in conversation. New York : Ballantine Books, 1990. 352 p.

Trudgill P. Sex, Covert Prestige and Linguistic Change. Urban British English of Norwich Language in Society. Vol 1. No 2. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1979. P. 179–195.

Watson D C. Gender differences in gossip and friendship. Sex Roles. Vol. 67(9–10). 2012. P. 494–502.

West C. and Zimmerman D. H. Doing Gender. Gender and Society. 1987. Vol. 1(2). С. 94–124.

Wolfson N. Perspectives : Sociolinguistics and TESOL. New York : Newbury House Publishers, 1989. 319 p.

Zimmerman,D. H. and West C. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. Language and Sex: difference and dominance. Rowely : Mass. Newbury House, 1975. P. 105–129.